I recently read a discussion on LinkedIn about online PR distribution and it struck a cord with me. As someone on the edge of PR distribution I don’t keep up to date on the latest methods of distribution. I knew that the days of PR being primarily printed and posted to cherished editors was over but I was also surprised that many of the PR people I’ve spoken to, focus much more on the writing and less on the relationships.
Personally if I was to outsource a service I’d be looking for someone with a passion for what I do or a build up knowledge of my industry. In particular with PR agencies I’d be looking for someone who could make fast connections into journals and magazines that I didn’t know about or didn’t have a relationship with. Am I old fashioned in that? Maybe, maybe not. Maybe it’s just that I know I can write a story so I’m looking for the other side to PR (in a very simplistic way of course)
The Linkedin discussion was based around online PR distribution and which one was better. It seems that you buy services per release or get locked into a contract which allows you to post up articles/releases for this online company to distribute far and wide. I think far and wide is the key thing here - there seems to be some targeting but the aim is to reach the parts (online and offline) that you cannot.
Some services such as PRWeb allow you to pay per release with a cost from £40 - £200 per release, depending on the level of service and distribution you’re after.
Vocus who partner with PRWeb give you the tools to manage your own distribution. They also allow you to build up your media information in the cloud, maintaining your contacts there and of course, allowing for some analytics of your PR work. This sounds great but the costs can be quite an investment.
Other ones mentioned are Cision, Meltwater Press, Businesswire and Marketwire. Cision focuses on being able to multi-task within their software allowing you to research articles, relevant journals, build your PR CRM and distribute your content. Businesswire again boasts the full range of PR services from news distribution to search engine optimisation. Some promote it well but the website was trying to do too many things to give me the quick answers I was after. I have to say that I lost all interest when I looked at Marketwire’s website and was hit by the phrase “Audience Engagement Cycle” Definitely not my kind of website, it was trying far too hard to be clever but ended up not actually telling me simply what it did and how it could help. However, as per the Linkedin discussion whatever the service is, it does work for some with some contributors praising it highly.
If you’re going into a contract, do check the small print as this may only allow you one press release per month and not allow you to carry them over to other months.
It’s obviously a complex world that I knew very little about - there are a myriad of tools out there to help you reach the audience you know and the audience you don’t yet know. However I still say that the best way to get to reach a quality audience is to know who you’re targeting and build a relationship with the teams that run relevant editorial.
I’ve written before about attendance at events - the good news when some exhibitions are showing great increases in visitor numbers but also those companies that assume people will turn up without putting in any effort. It’s the difference between the two that interests me - is it the topic that draws the audience or is it the marketing programme surrounding it?
Do you love tradeshows? Do you relish the chance to stand on a show floor for up to 10 hours and talk to strangers? I fear not many do - it’s hard, tiring work and even the thought of a good night out won’t always get you through the day with enthusiasm. However, if you’re not going to try to talk to the visitors, engage them and find out about their interests what is the point of you being there?
What is collaboration? To many it is working together with another company but is that collaboration or is it outsourcing? When I’ve asked questions and commented on Linkedin it seems to me that most people just see collaboration as working with someone else irrespective of the payments. I disagree - to be a real collaboration you need to pool ideas and share responsibility for a project. It’s only when you can work at that level that real collaboration and great innovation happens.
Firstly Happy New Year - I’m not sure that on the 20th Jan I really should still be saying that but as we’ve not spoken since December I feel it’s still appropriate.
So assuming that we’re all human and can’t maintain perfection and constant attention to all our clients, when do you give your best service? I’m sure to most of us our instinct is to give 100% all the time, to be on call for our clients whenever they need you but I’m also sure that there are times when you haven’t managed that goal. So do you find yourself focusing on excellent customer service for new clients or for the larger clients? Take some time to analyse this and look at what you can do to spread this over all your clients at all times.
The events industry has been challenging over the past two years - many companies are holding their budgets close to their chests and just not spending. I could spend hours explaining how to get value from your events but many people are just not listening as they have too many unknowns and it’s all too scary. As a business owner myself I do understand those issues, at times like this you do need to cut costs but don’t throw the baby out with the bath water. I’ve been lucky - I’ve won some new clients and been able to keep my events calendar going but I’ve not been overly challenged. However, I always work best when under pressure and so I’ve been looking at ways to get new experiences and keep every hour filled with new opportunities.
Comments
Post has no comments.